Moscow Commercial Court sets aside arbitral award and provides interpretation of Article 11 of Moscow Convention | Practical Law

Moscow Commercial Court sets aside arbitral award and provides interpretation of Article 11 of Moscow Convention | Practical Law

In Kyrgyzstan v Stans Energy Corporation, Kutisay Mining LLC (Case A40-64831/14), the Moscow Commercial Court has granted an application to set aside a Moscow Chamber of Commerce and Industry arbitral award. The court considered whether Article 11 of the Moscow Convention provides for actual consent of a member state to the Convention to arbitrate investments disputes under the Convention at any arbitral institution.

Moscow Commercial Court sets aside arbitral award and provides interpretation of Article 11 of Moscow Convention

by Maxim Kulkov (Managing Partner) and Dmitry Vlasov (Associate), Kulkov, Kolotilov & Partners
Published on 12 Jun 2015 • Russian Federation
In Kyrgyzstan v Stans Energy Corporation, Kutisay Mining LLC (Case A40-64831/14), the Moscow Commercial Court has granted an application to set aside a Moscow Chamber of Commerce and Industry arbitral award. The court considered whether Article 11 of the Moscow Convention provides for actual consent of a member state to the Convention to arbitrate investments disputes under the Convention at any arbitral institution.