Comparison of UAE and DIFC-seated arbitrations | Practical Law

Comparison of UAE and DIFC-seated arbitrations | Practical Law

This article analyses the options for arbitration in the UAE, including the DIFC. It analyses the advantages and disadvantages of using the UAE or the DIFC as a seat of arbitration, including issues relating to applicable law, formalities, interim measures, confidentiality, costs, and ratification of local and foreign awards.

Comparison of UAE and DIFC-seated arbitrations

Practical Law UK Articles 7-633-2274 (Approx. 17 pages)

Comparison of UAE and DIFC-seated arbitrations

by Dr Habib Al Mulla, Céline Abi Habib Kanakri, Sally Kotb and Andrew Massey, Baker McKenzie Habib Al Mulla
Law stated as at 01 Jul 2017 • Dubai International Financial Centre, United Arab Emirates
This article analyses the options for arbitration in the UAE, including the DIFC. It analyses the advantages and disadvantages of using the UAE or the DIFC as a seat of arbitration, including issues relating to applicable law, formalities, interim measures, confidentiality, costs, and ratification of local and foreign awards.
This article is part of the Arbitration and Dispute Resolution Global Guides.