Arbitration - effect of failure to comply with appointment requirements | Practical Law

Arbitration - effect of failure to comply with appointment requirements | Practical Law

In Sumukan Ltd v Commonwealth Secretariat [2007] EWCA Civ 1148, the Court of Appeal has held that a failure to comply with contractual requirements relating to the appointment of an arbitrator had the effect of invalidating the appointment. Setting aside the first instance judgment of Toulson J, the Court of Appeal held that the arbitrator lacked jurisdiction and that the arbitral award should be set aside pursuant to section 67 of the Arbitration Act 1996.

Arbitration - effect of failure to comply with appointment requirements

Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report 8-379-0731 (Approx. 6 pages)

Arbitration - effect of failure to comply with appointment requirements

by PLC Dispute Resolution
Published on 19 Nov 2007England, Northern Ireland, Wales
In Sumukan Ltd v Commonwealth Secretariat [2007] EWCA Civ 1148, the Court of Appeal has held that a failure to comply with contractual requirements relating to the appointment of an arbitrator had the effect of invalidating the appointment. Setting aside the first instance judgment of Toulson J, the Court of Appeal held that the arbitrator lacked jurisdiction and that the arbitral award should be set aside pursuant to section 67 of the Arbitration Act 1996.
The judgment of the Court of Appeal contains several points of interest, including a discussion of the circumstances in which a failure to comply with appointment procedures will invalidate the tribunal's jurisdiction, and confirmation that the "de facto" doctrine has no place in arbitration law.