US District Court dismisses South Korean firm's amended claims for failing to allege antitrust injury | Practical Law

US District Court dismisses South Korean firm's amended claims for failing to allege antitrust injury | Practical Law

The US District Court for the Northern District of California has dismissed several claims asserted by a South Korean firm against Flexsys and Azko Nobel alleging a conspiracy to restrain trade, foreclose markets, allocate customers, reduce supply, and monopolise trade. The district court held, among other things, that Korea Kumho Petrochemical Company (KKPC) failed to allege facts sufficient to demonstrate antitrust injury.

US District Court dismisses South Korean firm's amended claims for failing to allege antitrust injury

by Practical Law
Published on 01 May 2008USA (National/Federal)
The US District Court for the Northern District of California has dismissed several claims asserted by a South Korean firm against Flexsys and Azko Nobel alleging a conspiracy to restrain trade, foreclose markets, allocate customers, reduce supply, and monopolise trade. The district court held, among other things, that Korea Kumho Petrochemical Company (KKPC) failed to allege facts sufficient to demonstrate antitrust injury.