Majority lenders entitled to withdraw notice which had placed facilities on demand (High Court)

In Strategic Value Master Fund Ltd v Ideal Standard International Acquisition SARL and others [2011] EWHC 171 (Ch), the High Court considered whether the majority lenders under a facilities agreement had the right to withdraw a notice which had placed the facilities on demand or whether this was a matter requiring all lender consent. The court reached its conclusion by analysing whether there was a distinction between waiver of a term and waiver of a right or remedy. The court also considered whether the notice placing the facilities on demand meant that the original repayment schedule no longer applied and whether, on the wording of the facilities agreement, the balance sheet test of insolvency applied to the borrower or a breach of the interest cover covenant had been achieved under the equity cure provision.

PLC Finance


The full text of this resource is available by logging in or by requesting a trial. If you have any questions, please contact us or your Practical Law Account Executive.

Free trial

A free trial will give you:

Unlimited access to our online legal know-how services during the trial period
Full training and support
Four issues of Practical Law The Journal, the companion to Practical Law online
Weekly update e-mails on current legal developments in your practice area

Log in using Practical Law username

Only use this login if you have not set up OnePass for Practical Law

{ "siteName" : "PLC", "objType" : "PLC_Doc_C", "objID" : "1247398597810", "objName" : "Majority lenders entitled to withdraw notice which had placed", "userID" : "2", "objUrl" : "", "pageType" : "Resource", "academicUserID" : "", "contentAccessed" : "false", "analyticsPermCookie" : "25e8a493e:15b1a8a3a8d:-1044", "analyticsSessionCookie" : "25e8a493e:15b1a8a3a8d:-1043", "statisticSensorPath" : "" }