Wiley Rein: Court Finds That A Demand To Fulfill A Contract Is Not A Claim | Practical Law

Wiley Rein: Court Finds That A Demand To Fulfill A Contract Is Not A Claim | Practical Law

This Law Firm Publication by Wiley Rein LLP discusses St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co. v. RMG Capital Corp., (C.D. Cal. June 7, 2012), a case where the US District Court for the Central District of California held that a letter demanding that an insured confirm its intention to fulfill the insured's contractual obligations did not constitute a "claim" under the insurance policy. The publication discusses the factual background of the case and the court's ultimate legal holdings.

Wiley Rein: Court Finds That A Demand To Fulfill A Contract Is Not A Claim

Practical Law Article 8-520-0518 (Approx. 2 pages)

Wiley Rein: Court Finds That A Demand To Fulfill A Contract Is Not A Claim

by Wiley Rein LLP
Published on 21 Jun 2012 • California
This Law Firm Publication by Wiley Rein LLP discusses St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co. v. RMG Capital Corp., (C.D. Cal. June 7, 2012), a case where the US District Court for the Central District of California held that a letter demanding that an insured confirm its intention to fulfill the insured's contractual obligations did not constitute a "claim" under the insurance policy. The publication discusses the factual background of the case and the court's ultimate legal holdings.