Epstein Becker: Texas Supreme Court Now Requires Direct Proof of Age Discrimination When Replacement Employee Is Older Than the Plaintiff | Practical Law

Epstein Becker: Texas Supreme Court Now Requires Direct Proof of Age Discrimination When Replacement Employee Is Older Than the Plaintiff | Practical Law

This Law Firm Publication by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. discusses the Texas Supreme Court's 6-3 decision in Mission Consolidated Independent School District v. Garcia, ruling that terminated employees who have been replaced by older workers are not ever entitled to a presumption of age discrimination under the McDonell Douglas burden-shifting framework. Instead, they must generally establish direct evidence of discriminatory animus to sustain age discrimination claims under state law. The new standard adopted by the court could have significant consequences for other claims under the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act (TCHRA), including those alleging race, color, disability, religion, sex and national origin discrimination.

Epstein Becker: Texas Supreme Court Now Requires Direct Proof of Age Discrimination When Replacement Employee Is Older Than the Plaintiff

by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Published on 17 Jul 2012Texas, United States
This Law Firm Publication by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. discusses the Texas Supreme Court's 6-3 decision in Mission Consolidated Independent School District v. Garcia, ruling that terminated employees who have been replaced by older workers are not ever entitled to a presumption of age discrimination under the McDonell Douglas burden-shifting framework. Instead, they must generally establish direct evidence of discriminatory animus to sustain age discrimination claims under state law. The new standard adopted by the court could have significant consequences for other claims under the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act (TCHRA), including those alleging race, color, disability, religion, sex and national origin discrimination.