Jackson Lewis: Arm's Length Negotiations Between Sophisticated Parties Preclude Negligent Misrepresentation Claim in Minnesota | Practical Law

Jackson Lewis: Arm's Length Negotiations Between Sophisticated Parties Preclude Negligent Misrepresentation Claim in Minnesota | Practical Law

This Law Firm Publication by Jackson Lewis LLP discusses Williams v. Smith, in which the Minnesota Supreme Court held that a prospective employee, an assistant coach of a college basketball team, could not assert a claim for negligent misrepresentation against the team's head coach, who offered and later rescinded a job opportunity. A negligent representation claim is unavailable where a prospective employment relationship is negotiated at arm's length between sophisticated business persons and does not involve a professional, fiduciary or other special legal relationship. In Williams, the coaches engaged in an arm's length negotiation, and therefore the head coach did not owe a duty of care to the assistant.

Jackson Lewis: Arm's Length Negotiations Between Sophisticated Parties Preclude Negligent Misrepresentation Claim in Minnesota

by Jackson Lewis LLP
Published on 15 Aug 2012Minnesota, United States
This Law Firm Publication by Jackson Lewis LLP discusses Williams v. Smith, in which the Minnesota Supreme Court held that a prospective employee, an assistant coach of a college basketball team, could not assert a claim for negligent misrepresentation against the team's head coach, who offered and later rescinded a job opportunity. A negligent representation claim is unavailable where a prospective employment relationship is negotiated at arm's length between sophisticated business persons and does not involve a professional, fiduciary or other special legal relationship. In Williams, the coaches engaged in an arm's length negotiation, and therefore the head coach did not owe a duty of care to the assistant.