This article examines, among other things, the background to jurisdictional disputes between the China International Economic and Trade Commission (CIETAC Beijing) and the old CIETAC sub-commissions in Shanghai and South China, now known as SHIAC and SIAC. It also looks at relevant decisions that have taken conflicting stances. The article also notes the name changes of the institutions and considers key points for parties and arbitration practitioners, with guidance on using the new model clauses.