Private Equity in France: Overview | Practical Law

Private Equity in France: Overview | Practical Law

A Q&A guide to private equity law in France.

Private Equity in France: Overview

Practical Law Country Q&A 9-383-7931 (Approx. 27 pages)

Private Equity in France: Overview

by Olivier Deren, Sébastien Crepy, Allard de Waal, and Andras Csonka, Paul Hastings
Law stated as at 01 May 2023France
A Q&A guide to private equity law in France.
The Q&A gives a high-level overview of the key practical issues including the level of activity and recent trends in the market; investment incentives for institutional and private investors; the mechanics involved in establishing a private equity fund; equity and debt finance issues in a private equity transaction; issues surrounding buyouts and the relationship between the portfolio company's managers and the private equity funds; management incentives; and exit routes from investments.

Market Overview

1. What are the current major trends and what is the recent level of activity in the private equity market?
In keeping with the overall European private equity (PE) market, there is a developing trend in buy-and-build transactions in the French PE market. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, PE funds are tending to focus on tech, health, and education-related companies, which seem to be more resilient and are generating good levels of cash flow combined with high margins. These sectors offer stable long-term perspectives, which helps to lower uncertainty and mitigate adverse risks.

Fundraising

During the first half of 2022, investments in PE fundraising increased by 60% compared to the first half of 2021 (EUR16.1 billion during the first half of 2022 compared to EUR10 billion during the first half of 2021).
Out of the EUR16.1 billion raised, 12% came from family offices and individuals (+14% compared to the first half of 2021). However, during the first half of 2022, subscriptions were as much diversified in nature (insurers, pension funds, funds of funds, public sector, and sovereign funds) as well as in geographical origin (France for 55%, Europe for 23%, and the rest of the world for 22%) compared to the first half of 2021.
Fundraising is on the rise in all segments, driven both by fundraising in innovation capital and buyout capital.
The weight of fundraising in each segment during the first half of 2022 is in line with historical trends. Buyout capital is in the lead, accounting for 55% of all investments (EUR8.9 million, +82% compared to the first half of 2021, thanks to large-scale fundraising), followed by growth capital (EUR5.4 million, +46% compared to the first half of 2021). In third place is venture capital, accounting for 10% of all investments (EUR1.6 million, +18% compared to the first half of 2021). Finally comes turnaround capital, representing 1% of the investments (EUR1.27 million).
PE fundraising mostly occurred in the following sectors: industry (EUR3.1 billion invested, +55% compared to the first half of 2021), healthcare (EUR2.7 billion invested, +23% compared to the first half of 2021), and digital (EUR2.7 billion invested, +50% compared to the first half of 2021). These sectors are growing and confirm their attractiveness to private equity funds.

Investment

The level of activity has increased in each sector of capital investment over the past months, especially the development and innovation sectors:
  • Venture capital: 44% increase from EUR1.235 billion during the first half of 2021 to EUR1.780 billion during the first half of 2022.
  • Growth capital: 35% increase from EUR2.717 billion during the first half of 2021 to EUR3.666 billion during the first half of 2022.
  • Leveraged buyouts (LBOs): 12% increase from EUR6.501 billion during the first half of 2021 to EUR7.296 billion during the first half of 2022.
Over the first half of 2022, EUR12.8 billion was invested in more than 1,500 companies. Industry, health, and digital were the most favoured sectors.
However, over the first half of 2022, the average transaction amount fell slightly (EUR8.7 million during the first half of 2022 compared to EUR9 million during the first half of 2021), partly due to the sharp increase in transactions below EUR5 million.
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) is gradually becoming a competitive differentiator for PE investors. Investors no longer consider investment based on sustainability as a trade-off against economic matters, and fund managers are likely to take decisions around ESG when looking at investments' future value.

Transactions

2022 was an unusual year for French PE funds, which resulted from a polarised dynamic, with a very strong first half of the year, in line with the 2021 performances, and an extremely slow second half of the year, particularly regarding the volume of transactions. Throughout 2022, the transaction volume dropped by 10% and the average deal size dropped by 23% compared to 2021. These opposing trends may be explained by the uncertain international context and particularly the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. The inflationary shock generated by the conflict led to a rise in central banks' interest rates, as well as high volatility and uncertainty in the markets.
Growing uncertainty led to a higher risk aversion of PE funds, especially while dealing with large-cap transactions. Therefore, PE funds shifted their investment strategies to focus more on mid- or small-cap transactions, with lower financial risks.
PE funds got attracted by certain sectors, especially tech, health, and education-related companies, which seem to be more resilient and are generating good levels of cash flow combined with high margins.
Exits
During the first half of 2022, the global value of the exits in the French PE market amounted nearly to EUR4.687 billion from the sale of 717 companies. Industrial exits have increased (in value) over the course of the first half of 2022 (up 18% compared to the first half of 2021).
Equity sponsors' exits usually occur through sales to strategic buyers, or through secondary management buyouts.
However, PE exits through initial public offerings (IPOs) have not been a feature of the French market in the past years; only two IPOs occurred during the first half of 2021, and there were none during the first half of 2022.
2. What are the key differences between private equity and venture capital?
Private equity (PE) refers to a specific category of investment where investors' money is used to buy out businesses with investors' view to increasing the value of the company they are investing in, usually by increasing the profits and growing the business. PE investors usually invest in mature companies that are after the growth stage.
Venture capital (VC) refers to a specific category of investment where investors' money is injected into a business in exchange for stakes in the company. VC investors usually invest in start-up companies, which may be at different stages of their business life cycle (seed, early-stage, or late-stage).
Technically, there is an overlap between PE and VC funding (VC funding being a derivate of PE investments). However, the main differences are:
  • Type of business. PE investors look for mature businesses that may be facing ineffective leadership or seeking to raise funds to accelerate their internal and external growth. Their return on investment is lower as they are taken on less risk. Conversely, VC investors look for early-stage businesses with very high growth potential and therefore a higher potential return on investment (implying, however, a higher level of risk).
  • Control over the business. PE investors usually require a majority or a substantial minority stake in the company they are investing in, whereas VC investors usually only request a minority stake.
  • Exit strategy. PE investors often look to improve a business and then turn it around for a quick sale (that is, between three and four years). They are not interested in being involved in the business for a long period of time. VC investors are keen to be involved in the long-term growth of the company and to receive, in exchange, a substantial payout.

Funding Sources

3. How do private equity funds typically obtain their funding?
Over the first half of 2022, sources of funding in the French PE market were as follows:
  • Insurance companies: EUR3.178 billion (up 124% year on year).
  • Pension funds: EUR2.512 billion (up 152% year on year).
  • Funds of funds: EUR2.446 billion (down 11% year on year).
  • Public sector/government agencies: EUR2.424 billion (up 266% year on year).
  • Individuals and family offices: EUR1.892 billion (up 14% year on year).
  • Sovereign funds: EUR1.672 billion (up 136% year on year).
  • Banks: EUR1.102 billion (down 1% year on year).
  • Industrials: EUR710 million (up 48% year on year).

Tax Incentive Schemes

4. What tax incentive or other schemes exist to encourage investment in unlisted companies? At whom are the incentives or schemes directed? What conditions must be met?

Personal Income tax Reduction

French individual investors can benefit, under certain conditions, from a personal income tax reduction (Réduction Madelin) for:
  • Cash contributions to the original share capital or capital increases of certain small and medium-sized (SME) companies (as defined in the General Block Exemption Regulation (651/2014)), which have operated for less than seven years and carry out commercial, industrial or artisanal activity (financial and real estate activities are excluded).
  • Cash subscriptions in mutual funds investing in innovation (Fonds Commun de Placement dans l'Innovation) (FCPI) or local investment funds (Fonds d'Investissement de Proximité) (FIP), or similar funds located in an EU member state or in the European Economic Area (EEA).
The tax reduction is currently equal to 25% of the relevant cash contributions, provided that the French individual investor commits on subscription date to hold the shares or units received in exchange for five years, up to an annual limit of:
  • EUR50,000 for single, widowed, or divorced taxpayers.
  • EUR100,000 for married taxpayers subject to joint taxation.
The taxpayer can roll over any amount exceeding the annual limit and apply it towards a reduction, if it meets the same conditions, for the following four years.
The 25% rate applied temporarily from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2022. The usual rate is 18%.
This personal income tax reduction cannot be combined with other tax advantages, for example:
  • Shares held in stock savings plans (Plans d'Epargne en Actions) (PEA).
  • Retirement savings plans.
  • SME innovation accounts.
  • Employee savings plans (for example, a Plan d'Epargne Entreprise) (PEE), Plan d'Epargne Interentreprises (PEI) or Plan d'Epargne Collectif (PEC)).

Carried Interest tax Regime for Investment fund Managers

If certain conditions are met (see below), carried interest received by French investment fund executives is taxed as follows:
  • Distributions of interest income and dividend income are taxed as "investment income."
  • Distributions of capital gains are taxed as capital gains realised by natural persons on the sale of shares.
In practice, these two kinds of income are in principle subject to the French flat tax (a levy of 30%, comprising 12.8% personal income tax and 17.2% social contributions).
The conditions are that:
  • The French executives hold carried interest shares issued by a French fund or a foreign investment structure established in the EEA and with the main purpose of investing, directly or indirectly, in shares of unlisted companies or instruments giving access to the capital of unlisted companies, to create value for stakeholders through their management of these investments (this purpose must appear in the setting-up documents).
  • The French executives are (or were, at the date of subscription for or acquisition of the relevant shares) employees or corporate representatives of the issuing investment fund itself or of a company providing management services to the fund and remunerated at arm's length for those services.
  • The French executives subscribe for or acquired their carried interest units/shares at market price.
  • The French executives receive market standard compensation for their employment/corporate representative status (which allowed them to subscribe for or acquire their carried interest units/shares).
  • The carried interest units/shares form a single category of units/shares.
  • The subscription price for the carried interest units/shares is at least 1% of the portion of the total amount of investment fund subscriptions of EUR1 billion or below; and 0.5% of the portion of the total amount of subscriptions exceeding EUR1 billion. This is mitigated to 0.25% in relation to certain investment vehicles investing mainly in unlisted companies meeting an innovation requirement, or unlisted SMEs, provided that the carried interest units/shares do not give rights to more than 20% of the net assets or proceeds of these investment vehicles.
  • The rights under the carried interest units/shares are not crystallised before the end of a five-year withholding period (from the creation date of the issuing fund, for French investment funds, or from the date of issuance/subscription/closing if not paid up for EEA investment funds).
Failure to meet any one of these conditions in principle results in the carried interest income being taxed in the hands of the French executives as employment income (taxed subject to the scale of the French personal income tax (which has a marginal rate of 45%) and with an employee social security contribution of 30%).

Investments Proceeds Exemption

French tax residents can benefit from an exemption from French personal income tax for investments in a French investment fund if the fund either:
  • Qualifies as a tax fund (fond fiscal) (this can apply to a fond professionnel de capital investissement (FPCI) or a société de libre partenariat (SLP) if they meet the conditions (see below)).
  • Is an FCPI (meaning at least 70% of its investment portfolio is made in certain EEA-based unlisted SMEs satisfying an innovation requirement).
(Article 163, quinquies B, General Tax Code.)
A FPCI or SLP qualifies as a tax fund if at least 50% of its assets consist of shares (including ordinary and preferred shares) or instruments of companies:
  • Whose registered office is located in an EEA member state.
  • Subject to corporate income tax.
  • Carrying out commercial, industrial or artisanal activities.
  • Not traded on a French or foreign regulated stock market, or, if so, the companies must:
    • not represent more than 20% of the fund's assets;
    • be traded on a regulated stock market of an EEA country; and
    • have a market capitalisation below EUR150 million.
Unit holders of a qualifying investment fund can benefit from an exemption on French personal income tax (at 12.8%) on dividends, interest and capital gains realised by the fund and capital gains realised on the disposal of their units, provided that:
  • The unit holder commits, on the subscription date, to hold the qualifying fund's units for five years.
  • During this five-year holding period, the unit holder reinvests into the fund any distribution it made (whether drawn from capital gains, dividends or interests received by the fund).
  • The unit holder and the unit holder's family do not hold, directly or indirectly, more than 25% of the financial rights of a company whose shares are held by the fund, and have not done so during the five years before the subscription of the fund's units.
It should be noted that distributions to unitholders (dividends, interests or capital gains received or realised by the fund), and capital gains realised by them on the disposal of their units in the fund, remain subject to:
  • Social contributions at the rate of 17.2%.
  • Inclusion in the assessment of the French exceptional contribution on high incomes

Corporate Income tax Incentives

French corporate investors in a qualifying tax fund (see above) benefit from the following exemptions (although shares of predominantly real estate companies sit outside such exemption regime):
  • Distributions drawn by the tax fund from the proceeds of asset sales or from capital gains realised by certain capital-risk entities in which the tax fund owns stakes (funds of tax fund), are deemed capital repayments and are not taxable up to the amount invested by the unit holder (and which has not yet been used through similar previous distributions). For unit holders who are not original fund subscribers, the distributions are deemed tax-free capital repayments up to the purchase price of their units. In relation to the excess amount, where the unit holder has invested in the distributing tax fund for at least two years, the long-term regime for capital gains, meaning that the excess is:
    • exempt from tax, where the gain was realised on a disposal of portfolio companies' shares which qualify as "participation" (shares representing more than 5% of the portfolio company's share capital of the portfolio company) and those shares were held for more than two years by the fund; or
    • taxed at a reduced corporate income tax rate of 15% (where the shares do not qualify as "participation" but have been held for at least two years).
  • Capital gains from the sale of the tax fund units, or liquidation of the tax fund, benefit from the French long-term regime if the corporate investor has invested in the fund for at least five years. This regime provides:
    • an exemption up to the portion of the tax fund's assets composed of shares in companies in which the tax fund has held a 5% "participation" for at least two years; and
    • 15% taxation up to the portion of the tax fund's assets composed of shares held for less than two years by the fund and/or representing less than 5% of the issuing company's share capital.

Fund Structuring

5. What legal structure(s) are most commonly used as a vehicle for private equity funds?
A French PE entity typically has two layers of legal structure in place to control PE investments:
  • The PE vehicle:
    • this is typically an alternative investment fund (AIF) in the form of either a professional private equity investment fund (fonds professionnel de capital investissement) (FPCI), a limited partnership (société de libre partenariat) (SLP), or a specialised professional fund (fond professionnel spécialisé) (FPS). Their shares/units can only be subscribed for, or acquired by, qualified investors; or
    • the FPCI and the FPS do not have legal personality, while the SLP has legal personality. The SLP was introduced in French law in 2016 to mirror English and Luxembourg limited partnerships, and has legal form very similar to that of a French limited partnership (société en commandite simple), which is registered with the Trade and Companies Register and comprises two categories of shareholders, the general partners with unlimited liability and the limited partners with limited liability.
  • The management company (société de gestion), which is typically a simplified joint stock company (société par actions simplifiée) or a joint-stock company (société anonyme) supervised by the financial markets authority (Autorité des Marchés Financiers) (AMF).
6. Are these structures subject to entity level taxation, tax exempt or tax transparent (flow through structures) for domestic and foreign investors?
FPCIs, FPSs, and SLPs (see Question 5) are not subject to corporate income tax in France. They are tax transparent flow-through structures, so in principle the investors are directly subject to personal or corporate income tax (subject to any reductions or exemptions discussed in Question 4).
7. What foreign private equity structures are tax-inefficient in your jurisdiction? What alternative structures are typically used in these circumstances?
Foreign PE funds investing in French holding portfolio companies may be subject to withholding tax. They generally interpose foreign companies subject to corporate income tax under common law conditions, to benefit from an applicable double tax treaty and therefore avoid any French withholding tax. Any interposition is subject to substance requirements (meaning the transaction must have a purpose aside from reduction of tax liability, and an economic effect as well as the tax effect, to avail itself of any tax benefits).
French tax law provides for a restrictive treatment with respect to entities located in non-cooperative states and territories (NCST), unless those entities can demonstrate that their activities are real and do not seek to artificially locate taxable profits in the NCST. In this regard, the French government publishes annually a list of uncooperative states and territories covered by this restrictive regime. This list currently includes American Samoa, Anguilla, the British Virgin Islands, Fiji, Guam, Palau, Panama, Samoa, Seychelles, Trinidad and Tobago, the US Virgin Islands, and Vanuatu, the Bahamas, and the Turks and Caicos Islands.

Fund Duration and Investment Objectives

8. What is the average duration of a private equity fund? What are the most common investment objectives of private equity funds?

Duration

Most PE funds established in France have a term of eight to ten years, although the fund documentation can provide for an extension of one or two years to allow the realisation of all investments.
This fund term can be broken down into three stages:
  • Initial investment window of four to five years, to source the investments and complete the initial investment in the target companies.
  • An asset management period of five to eight years from the investment completion date.
  • A realisation period, during which PE fund seeks to dispose its investments.
Subject to the specific terms of the fund documentation, there is no diversification ratio for PE investments. Therefore, the number of investments that can be expected to be made over the life of a PE fund will vary depending on the contractual limitations imposed to the PE fund. Generally, the contractual diversification ratio of PE funds is set to a maximum of 10% of the total commitments in one target, with the possibility to exceed this cap with the advisory committee's prior consent.

Investment Objectives

Generally, PE funds target returns of between 10% and 15% each year, which may rise to between 25% and 30% a year for the buyout sector. The success of the investment is generally measured by either of the following metrics, depending on the fund's investment strategy:
  • The internal rate of return.
  • A total money multiple.
Specific rules may apply to PE funds, depending on the companies they are investing in. For example, PE funds investing in the health sector may be subject to specific regulations. Conversely, VC funds mostly invest in unlisted companies and their investment objectives may be very broad:
  • Certain VC funds are dedicated to specific funding rounds (for example, series A, B, or C investments or seed investments).
  • Certain VC funds are industry driven (either in the tech, food, or health industry).
  • Certain VC funds can be open-ended (evergreen funds), pursuing investment opportunities in series C and D over the long-term.
VC funds usually target capital gains through exits from portfolio companies (it being specified that VC funds hold their investments in portfolio companies for an average of three to five years).

Fund Regulation and Licensing

9. Do a private equity fund's promoter, principals and manager require authorisation or other licences?
The level of regulatory involvement by the AMF depends on the structuring of the fund (the number and nature of investors, amount of assets under management, type of funds, among other factors).
For example, most types of AIFs must be managed by an external portfolio management company (self-managed AIFs are not common), while the AMF's regulatory oversight is limited for certain type of corporate investment entities that would qualify as AIFs but whose investors are all professional investors (as defined in the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (2014/65/EU) (MiFID II)) and whose assets under management (including assets acquired through the use of leverage) do not exceed either:
  • EUR100,000.
  • EUR500,000.
This is provided that the portfolio companies under management were not leveraged and that investors had no redemption rights exercisable for a period of five years following the date of the initial investment in each AIF.
Most French PE funds, encompassing all strategies from LBO funds to VC funds, are structured as alternative investment funds (AIFs) and consequently fall within the scope of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers (AIFM) Directive (2011/61/EC), which provides that AIFs must:
  • Be managed by a management company which is approved by the AMF or other EU regulator as a portfolio management company AIFM.
  • Appoint a depositary.
10. Are private equity funds regulated as investment companies or otherwise and, if so, what are the consequences? Are there any exemptions?

Regulation

French PE investment vehicles will generally be structured as FPCIs or SLPs, which both qualify as AIFs and whose target investors are professional investors (as defined in the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (2014/65/EU) (MiFID II)) or investors committing to a minimum investment of EUR100,000 (other criteria may be applicable). If the target investors are retail clients, some types of AIF are designed for PE investment strategies specifically aimed at individual or retail investors, such as:
  • Retail PE investment funds (fonds commun de placement à risques) (FCPR).
  • Retail venture capital investment funds (FCPI) (see Question 4).
  • Retail local investment funds (FIP) (see Question 4).
Being AIFs, these vehicles are subject to the French rules in relation to marketing.
Marketing units or shares of an AIF in France involves presenting them on French territory by different means (advertising, direct marketing, investment advice, and so on) with a view to encouraging an investor to subscribe to or purchase them.
For example, marketing in France to professional clients of units or shares of AIFs established in the European Union (France included) and managed by a French or EU AIFM, is an authorisation regime and that regime is exclusive of any other. No marketing of these AIFs can occur unless prior approval is obtained.
This regime makes no distinction in relation to the PE strategy (VC, LBO, or other) of the AIF.

Exemptions

11. Are there any restrictions on investors in private equity funds?
Aside from money laundering and anti-terrorism financing checks and know-your-customer requirements, French authorities have a foreign direct investment (FDI) regime, which has been tightened over the last few years to protect strategic fields. Under the FDI rules, an investment carried out in France requires the prior authorisation of the French Ministry of Economy (MoE), if either:
  • The investment is carried out in France by a foreign investor. A foreign investor is either:
    • a foreign individual;
    • a French individual whose tax residence is outside of France;
    • a foreign legal entity;
    • a legal entity incorporated under the laws of France but controlled by one or several of the individuals or legal entities listed above.
    (Article R. 151-1, Monetary and Financial Code.)
    If the regulated investment involves an investment fund, the management company is deemed to be the foreign investor.
  • The investment is qualified as a share deal, an asset deal, or a threshold crossing (that is, regulated investments).
  • The activity of the investment's target company falls into one of the categories of regulated sector/activity. French authorities have recently extended the scope of activities covered by the FDI rules. These now apply to activities likely to undermine public authority, public order, public security, or national defence interests, and encompass broad strategic sectors such as defence, cybersecurity, food safety, research and development, and biotechnologies.
At the end of its review, the MoE can either accept or reject the contemplated investment (subject to the foreign investor, if applicable, satisfying the conditions imposed by the MoE).
Therefore, PE investors should be aware that proposed investments into France may be closely examined by the MoE for their potential impact in a wide range of sectors. However, almost all deals get through the FDI screening.
In addition, some types of AIFs (notably FPCIs, FPSs, or SLPs) are restricted to:
  • Professional investors, as defined in the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (600/2014).
  • Individual investors committing to a minimum investment of EUR100,000.
  • Recently, investment opportunities in PE funds have emerged for non-professional individual investors, with a lower individual investment ticket. For example, Bpifrance has launched two retail funds aimed at non-professional individual investors: Bpifrance Entreprises 1, a fund aimed at individual investments amounting to EUR5,000; and Bpifrance Enterprises 2, with almost identical terms and conditions but with a lower individual investment amounting to EUR3,000.
12. Are there any statutory or other maximum or minimum investment periods, amounts or transfers of investments in private equity funds?
There are no statutory requirements on investment periods or amounts for PE funds. However, the type of investments made are regulated according to the fund's legal form. For example:
  • FPCIs must invest at least 50% of their assets in:
    • securities of companies not admitted to trading on a French or foreign market operated by a market operator or investment services provider; or
    • shares in limited liability companies, or foreign companies with an equivalent status.
  • FCPIs must invest at least 70% of their assets in:
    • financial securities;
    • shares in limited liability companies; and
    • current account advances from innovative unlisted companies.
  • SLPs (similar to FPCIs for tax purposes) must invest at least 50% of their assets in:
    • securities of companies not admitted to trading on a French or foreign market operated by a market operator or investment services provider; or
    • shares in limited liability companies, or foreign companies with an equivalent status.
  • Mirroring the increase in the emphasis on environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors in investment decision-making, the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (2019/2088) (SFDR) establishes new extra-financial obligations for both financial and non-financial companies, aimed at helping them to understand, compare and monitor their sustainability characteristics through standardised sustainability disclosure obligations.
  • The SFDR provides for a framework to categorise private equity funds and their underlying financial products depending on their level of promotion of their environmental and social attributes under Articles 6, 8 and 9 of the SFDR; private equity funds falling under Article 6 of the SFDR face fewest requirements, while pre-contractual and reporting obligations (both quantitative and qualitative), proportionally increase for private equity funds falling under Article 8 or Article 9 of the SFDR.
  • In parallel, the Taxonomy Regulation (2020/852) (which applies to private equity funds falling under Article 8 or Article 9 of the SFDR) establishes an evolving set of rules adapted to climate change transition which define the criteria for considering whether an economic activity is sustainable and can be reported as such in the private equity fund's periodical extra-financial reports.
13. How is the relationship between the investor and the fund governed? What protections do investors in the fund typically seek?
Corporate protection. The management company must act in an honest, fair, and professional manner, serving the best interests of investors (Article L.533-22-2-1, Monetary and Financial Code).
Regulatory protection. PE funds have several obligations towards their investors, notably in respect of disclosure. The AIFM Directive specifies information to be notified or made available to the investor before the investment, in the event of any change in the product, and as part of annual reporting. The AMF's General Regulation also provides for more extensive duties, such as the preparation of prospectuses.
PE funds are also subject to a code of good conduct and ethical obligations established by France Invest and the Association Française de la Gestion financière (AFG) under a framework for the relationship between the PE funds and their investors. The PE management company must also establish and apply a compensation policy that is consistent with effective risk management and discourages excessive risk-taking. Failure to comply with the compensation policy may result in official sanctions from the AMF.
Protection through incentives. French PE fund managers often have shares in the fund management company and typically subscribe for shares in the fund representing a symbolic percentage of the total commitments; this incentivises them through carried interest and aligns their interests with those of investors.
Contractual protection. The contractual protections sought depend on the type of investors. For example, institutional investors have stringent requirements, in particular regarding:
  • Governance. For example provisions for:
    • removal of managers, both for fault and without fault;
    • change of control of the manager of the PE fund, where investors would generally seek to be able to transfer the management of the PE fund if the change of control has not been authorised by the advisory committee of the PE fund; and
    • key persons.
  • Investment of the team in the fund (specifying the amount of investment, and also vesting mechanisms).
A corporate investor may want to negotiate:
  • Access to the deal flow of the PE in relation to a specific type/sector of investments
  • Preferential rights to co-investment (investment by limited partners in a particular transaction in parallel to, rather than through, the main fund).
  • A specific type of reporting, as certain corporate investors can be listed on financial markets and may need specific information regarding the activity of the PE fund, such as the investments that were made.

Interests in Portfolio Companies

14. What forms of equity and debt interest are commonly taken by a private equity fund in a portfolio company? Are there any restrictions on the issue or transfer of shares by law? Do any withholding taxes or capital gains taxes apply?

Most Common Form

PE funds invest in a combination of equity (in the form of ordinary and preference shares) and debt instruments (such as simple or convertible bonds):
  • From the fund's perspective, the main advantage of bonds over preference shares is that the interest accruing on the bonds can be paid to the holder as it falls due, while a dividend payable on a preference share can only be paid if the portfolio company has profits available for distribution and the debt financing has been reimbursed.
  • From the manager's perspective, the main advantage of preference shares over bonds is that they allow the manager to retain a fair amount of the share capital and voting rights while still allowing the holding portfolio company (Newco) to benefit from the money from the investment.
VC funds mostly invest in equity through the subscription of preferred shares or debt instruments, such as convertible bonds allowing VC investors to participate in the next financing round on preferential terms. These debt instruments are attractive for early-stage companies that have limited or no access to traditional debt instruments and are eager to limit the dilution of their shareholders.

Restrictions

There are generally no restrictions on the transfer of shares by law. The articles of association of Newco may sometimes provide for prior approval of any transfer to be required from any corporate body of Newco. Additionally, restrictions are generally provided under the Newco shareholders' agreement.

Taxes

Capital gains made by French fund managers (provided that they comply with the rules set by Article 163 quinquies B II-1 of the General Tax Code) benefit from a preferential flat tax regime (at a global rate of 30% plus potentially a 3% or 4% surcharge).
From the fund's perspective, see Question 6 with respect to proceeds deriving from a sale of assets.

Buyouts

15. Is it common for buyouts of private companies to take place by auction? Which legislation and rules apply?
Auctions are common in the French PE market. No specific legislation or rules apply to them.
The process is typically managed by an investment bank working with the selling side, and generally proceeds in two phases:
  • Phase 1:
    • selling shareholders, with the investment bank's assistance, select potential bidders (PE funds and/or traders) and circulate to them an information memorandum comprising all the main data regarding the target company/group and its growth forecasts in the market(s) in which it operates;
    • selected bidders provide the investment bank with a non-binding offer including an indicative purchase price; and
    • selling shareholders, with the investment bank's assistance, select a certain number of bidders for the Phase 2 period (see below).
  • Phase 2:
    • during such period, the bidders can access additional information regarding the target company/group through a virtual data room, enabling them to carry out due diligence; and
    • bidders then prepare a binding offer letter to be provided to the investment bank at the end of the phase 2 period.
16. Are buyouts of listed companies (public-to-private transactions) common? Which legislation and rules apply?
Public-to-private transactions are achieved through a leverage buyout of the listed company and taking it off the stock market. This option tends to be chosen for small- and medium-sized listed companies that have been neglected by investors and whose share price is not liquid and is under-rated on the market.
French law presents some serious obstacles for public-to-private transactions, and so they are relatively uncommon. In most cases, the shareholding structure of French listed companies is constantly changing, hard to determine and widely held.
In 2019, Law No. 2019-468 of 22 May 2019 relating to companies' growth and transformation (PACTE Law) reduced the squeeze-out threshold for all companies listed on Euronext and Euronext Growth from 95% to 90%, aligning France with other major European markets such as the UK and Germany. Theoretically this makes it easier for French PE firms to complete public-to-private transactions and also to acquire more easily the critical threshold of 95% of the capital or voting rights of the listed company at stake, which is key to benefit from the French tax consolidation regime).
However, despite this legislative change, the number of public-to-private operations has not escalated over the past three years (due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting market uncertainty). This is likely to remain the case in the near future, due to the global financial crisis and difficulties for investment funds in obtaining financing.
The following legislation apply to public to private transactions:
  • Monetary and Financial Code.
  • General Tax Code.
  • General Regulations of the AMF.
In the case where a PE fund invests in a listed company, it usually proceeds first to the acquisition of minority or majority stakes and then to a squeeze-out in order to acquire the remaining floating stock of the target listed company. In addition, certain PE funds focus their investment strategy on the acquisition of stakes in listed companies (for example, Lac1, a PE fund controlled by Bpifrance Investissement, which takes control in listed companies having a significant influence over the French economy (such as Arkema in November 2020, EssilorLuxottica in February 2021, and Groupe Seb in March 2022)).

Principal Documentation

17. What are the principal documents produced in a buyout?
The main documents used in a PE buyout generally include (but are not limited to):
  • Transaction kick-off:
    • information memorandum;
    • letter of intent;
    • non-disclosure agreement;
    • term sheet; and
    • due diligence report.
  • Pre-signing/signing:
    • information letters to each employee of the target if Law No. 2014-344 of 17 March 2014 on Consumer Protection (Hamon Law) applies. This statute provides that, where a small company is to be sold, the employer selling its business must inform the workforce to allow employees to make a purchase offer (Articles L-23-10-1 and following, Commercial Code);
    • special note describing the contemplated transaction drafted in the presence of the target's economic and social committee (this committee must by law be informed/informed and consulted, and the seller(s) cannot be bound to sell until the economic and social committee has issued its decision with respect to the transaction);
    • share purchase agreement (SPA); and
    • put option agreement drafted in the presence of an economic and social committee, with agreed form SPA attached.
  • Corporate documents on closing date:
    • new articles of association of the holding portfolio company (Newco) in charge of the acquisition of the target company;
    • minutes of Newco corporate decisions on closing date (generally, share capital increase at closing, issuance of bonds, appointment of new managers, and so on);
    • terms and conditions of the various categories of securities to be issued by Newco on the closing date; and
    • if free shares are to be allocated to the managers, free shares plan, letters of allocation, and minutes of relevant Newco corporate decisions.
  • Agreements to be entered into on closing date:
    • corporate office agreement, employment agreement or services agreement to be entered into with any managers to be appointed;
    • services agreement to be entered into between Newco and the target group companies;
    • contribution in kind agreement(s);
    • shareholders' agreement in relation to Newco; and
    • put/call option agreements to be entered into by the managers.
  • Closing deliveries:
    • share transfer forms;
    • tax transfer forms (Formulaire Cerfa No. 2759);
    • termination deeds where necessary;
    • resignation letter of past managers; and
    • other closing deliveries to be provided under the SPA.
  • Other documents as required for financing and tax purposes.

Buyer Protection

18. What forms of contractual buyer protection do private equity funds commonly request from sellers and/or management? Are these contractual protections different for buyouts of listed companies (public-to-private transactions)?
In buyouts, the usual main contractual protections for the buyer set out in SPA are:
  • A price adjustment mechanism, which protects the buyer from any change in the target company's value between signing and closing. Rather than a "locked box" price mechanism, this structure ensures the buyer pays only for what it gets.
  • Sellers' representations and warranties. The buyer can usually negotiate general representations and warranties with sellers on a primary buyout; however, it usually only obtains fundamental representations and warranties from the sellers on secondary management buyouts (but can take out a specific representations and warranties insurance policy).
  • A material adverse change (MAC) clause can be included, under which either party can renegotiate the transaction if a serious event arises and compromises the value of the transaction negotiated between the parties. The use of MAC clauses is unusual in the French PE market, and they usually exclude any changes directly or indirectly caused by a pandemic or by the current conflict in Ukraine.
PE funds also tend to seek restrictive covenants from corporate sellers or management to preserve the goodwill of the portfolio company during signing and closing. However, PE sellers are rarely, if ever, willing to enter into restrictive covenants on a sale.
Contractual protection on public-to-private deals is extremely limited.
19. What non-contractual duties do the portfolio company managers owe and to whom?
According to case law, any corporate officer of a company:
  • Must behave prudently, diligently and in good faith, or be liable to the company or the company's shareholders.
  • Has a duty of loyalty towards the company's shareholders.
The fund manager of a French AIF must also comply with the:
  • Principle of good conduct (Article L.214-24-3, Monetary and Financial Code).
  • Duty of transparency towards the AIF's subscribers, requiring the publication by the management company of certain periodic reports under the provisions of the Monetary and Financial Code (in particular, Articles L.214-24-62 and D.214-33).
20. What terms of employment are typically imposed on management by the private equity investor in an MBO?
Executive managers involved in any private equity transaction are either appointed through a corporate mandate or through an employment contract.

Corporate Mandate

The corporate mandate of an executive manager can usually be terminated instantly, following a shareholders' decision and/or a board decision. The executive manager can generally be dismissed at any time and for any reason. As a result, executive managers usually negotiate a "golden parachute" in the corporate mandate, which is a financial indemnification in case of early termination of their corporate office in the company.
The executive manager's corporate mandate usually also provides a contractual unemployment insurance policy clause under which the company takes out private insurance securing 60% to 80% of the executive manager's salary in the event of termination of their corporate mandate.
Executive managers usually take out directors' liability insurance (Assurance Responsabilité des Dirigeants) for protection against, for example, a failure to comply with legal, regulatory or statutory obligations, mismanagement, poor decision-making and so on.
Executive managers can also be subject to non-competition and exclusivity provisions in their corporate mandate/employment contract. Non-competition provisions for an executive manager subject to a corporate mandate must be:
  • Limited in duration.
  • Limited geographically.
  • Necessary to protect the legitimate interests of the company.

Management Employment Contract

Executive managers can also be appointed through an employment contract. In that case, the employment contract must contain specific provisions to ensure that the manager can take management decisions, and organise their work schedule, independently.
An employment contract of any executive manager usually provides the main following clauses:
  • Working time arrangements: the executive manager benefits from annual leave but is not subject to any working time limits.
  • Contractual termination of the employment contract: the executive manager can negotiate a contractual financial indemnification for their benefit in the case of dismissal.
  • Contractual retirement clause: the executive manager can negotiate the implementation of a retirement plan with an external pensions organisation/entity.
  • Fixed and variable remuneration clause and benefits in kind clause (for example, car and accommodation).
  • Mobility clause: this enables the employer to modify the workplace of its employee within a perimeter determined in advance by the parties.
  • Non-competition clause: to be valid, a non-competition clause must not be drafted in a way that completely precludes the executive manager from performing any activities during the non-competition period, and must be:
    • necessary to protect the legitimate interests of the company;
    • limited in duration;
    • limited geographically; and
    • compensated by sufficient financial consideration (this element differs from the position for an executive manager under a corporate mandate (see above)).
  • Clients and prospects non-solicitation clause: this is similar to a non-compete clause (and must therefore be financially compensated (see above)).
  • Employees' non-solicitation clause: this precludes the executive manager from hiring any other employee of the group portfolio companies after leaving.
An employment contract offers a stronger protection than a corporate mandate, as French law tends to protect employees. For example, while executive managers under a corporate mandate can usually be dismissed without any cause, employees can only be terminated for certain specific cause. Where the ground for termination is not valid, for any reason, the employee is usually entitled to benefit from a financial compensation based on their seniority.

Combination

An executive manager can validly hold a corporate mandate and an employment contract at the same time (suspended or in force) under certain conditions. To be valid, the duties performed as a corporate officer must be totally different than those performed as an employee. If the functions occupied as an employee are too close to those performed as a corporate officer, the combination of status is not considered valid.
21. What measures are commonly used to give a private equity fund a level of management control over the activities of the portfolio company? Are such protections more likely to be given in the shareholders' agreement or company governance documents?
The Newco shareholders' agreement usually gives the PE fund a power of supervision over the important decisions to be taken by the portfolio companies' executive managers in the course of management of the portfolio group companies. However, a PE fund is unlikely actually to exercise any management duties over the activities of the portfolio companies, to avoid attracting any liability.
Power of supervision measures (including a veto right for the PE fund) are sometimes also contained in Newco's articles of association, enabling them to be enforceable in relation to third parties. This is used particularly often in the context of a minority investment by a PE fund.
In addition, the PE fund may incorporate the following rights in relation to Newco:
  • Typically, the right to appoint at least one person to the Newco supervisory board.
  • The right for a PE fund representative to observe Newco supervisory board meetings.
  • A requirement that Newco's supervisory board is not quorate without the attendance of the fund-appointed supervisory board member(s).
Executive managers undertake in their corporate mandate or employment contract to submit any material decision to Newco's supervisory board for prior authorisation. Material decisions are pre-agreed by the shareholders and listed in the shareholders' agreement.
Even if the PE fund does not have any membership of the supervisory board, the PE fund may contractually (under the provisions of the shareholders' agreement) retain a veto right over "reserved" matters such as:
  • The acquisition or disposal of assets.
  • The issue of shares or options.
  • The redemption of shares.
  • Changes to constitutional documents.
  • Increases of indebtedness.
The PE fund also typically has discretion over the timing, and form, of the exit mechanism.

Debt Financing

22. What percentage of finance is typically provided by debt and what form does that debt financing usually take?
French PE transactions typically involve a mixture of debt and equity, with the ratio driven by the relevant sector, the geography, the size of the deal, the market conditions and the cost and availability of debt, to optimise the return of equity sponsors (both from a financial and a tax perspective).
Debt may be provided by both traditional lenders (banks) and alternative lenders (funds). As a result, there is now a wide array of other debt products being offered to market participants to replace or supplement traditional senior secured bank loans, such as mezzanine or uni-tranche loans, and second lien loan or quasi-equity instruments.

Lender Protection

23. What forms of protection do debt providers typically use to protect their investments?
The most common forms of protection are security packages and contractual mechanisms.

Security

A debt provider typically requires a full security package from the portfolio company, including:
  • Charges over its valuable assets.
  • Pledges over the shares in the portfolio company held by the acquisition vehicle.

Contractual and Structural Mechanisms

Contractual subordination is commonly used, and can be achieved through inter-creditor agreements, or subordination agreements with debt providers. These agreements contractually determine the ranking on an insolvent liquidation. They often prohibit the payment of dividends, redemption of share capital or repayment of equity loans until the external debt has been repaid.

Structural Subordination

Structural subordination is achieved by inserting one or more intermediate holding companies between the acquisition vehicle and the PE fund. Senior debt is lent to the acquisition vehicle and any higher yield debt instruments or equity funds are lent to intermediate companies higher up the acquisition structure. Any payments up the structure are only made once the senior debt is paid.

Financial Assistance

24. Are there rules preventing a company from giving financial assistance for the purpose of assisting a purchase of shares in the company? If so, how does this affect the ability of a target company in a buyout to give security to lenders? Are there exemptions?

Rules

A joint stock company cannot provide financial assistance (whether by loan, guarantee, the provision of security, or another form) for the purchase of its own shares (Article 225-216, Commercial Code). This provision also applies to the simplified joint stock company, the most common corporate form used for a holding portfolio company in the context of any PE transaction structured in France (Article 227-1, Commercial Code).

Exemptions

Financial assistance is permitted when it is undertaken for the day-to-day operations of credit institutions and financing companies or for the acquisition of shares by company's or subsidiaries' employees (Article 227-1, Commercial Code).
In the context of a PE transaction, investment is usually completed through a Newco, to ensure that the financial assistance provisions do not apply. However, the general ban on financial assistance must be borne in mind in the context of structuring any PE transaction in France (for example, avoiding upstream loans).

Insolvent Liquidation

25. What is the order of priority on insolvent liquidation?
In a judicial liquidation, the debt providers take priority over the shareholders in any distribution of assets. The order of priority is as follows (without prejudice to propriety rights or rights of retention enforceable in the proceedings):
  • Priority creditors (including super privilege of employee wages).
  • Fees for the liquidation proceedings.
  • Providers of new money as part of a workout agreement from previous conciliation proceedings.
  • Lenders' liens on real estate and mortgages according to their rank.
  • Wages which do not constitute employee priority claims (see above).
  • Providers of post money, given with the aim of ensuring continued activity for the duration of the liquidation proceedings or until execution of a safeguard/rehabilitation plan decided by the court.
  • Other post-petition claims arising from continuation of contracts with creditors who agreed to a deferred payment.
  • Wages becoming due during the observation period (a period in insolvency safeguard proceedings of up to six months to assess the company's financial position) and until the effective redundancy of employees.
  • Other post-petition claims and prior-petition claims for which payment is authorised.
  • Direct tax contribution.
  • Creditors secured by pledges, and lessors.
  • Indirect tax contributions.
  • Other unsecured creditors (including shareholders).
Shareholders can vary the priority ranking between themselves through statutory or contractual waterfall or other ranking arrangements.

Equity Appreciation

26. Can a debt holder achieve equity appreciation through conversion features such as rights, warrants or options?
A range of convertible debt instruments are permitted under French law, including convertible bonds and warrants. These instruments typically include trigger events, on the occurrence of which the instrument automatically converts to equity.
While the types of convertible instrument used in PE transactions are commonly "plain vanilla," other instruments such as redeemable bonds are often used in the context of distressed operations.

Portfolio Company Management

27. What management incentives are most commonly used to encourage portfolio company management to produce healthy income returns and facilitate a successful exit from a private equity transaction?
The most commonly used management incentives are:
  • Free shares. The equity incentive arrangement most commonly used is the allocation of free Newco shares to the managers; these can be either ordinary shares or preferred (ratchet) shares. Free shares are particularly relevant for primary leveraged buyouts or for second or third cycle managers (that is, for operating managers as opposed to senior managers) in secondary leveraged buyouts, as they cannot represent more than 10% of the issuer's outstanding capital (Article L.225-197-1, Commercial Code) and, as a consequence, 10% of the exit proceeds. Free shares may not be efficient for managers residing outside France, as the jurisdiction in which they are resident may tax the allocation of free shares as a fringe benefit arising on their allocation.
  • Sweet equity. Under a sweet equity mechanism, the Newco managers invest in Newco shares; the price they pay on subscription generally sets the amount the financial investors must subscribe for equity (or ordinary) shares, and the balance of the investor's investment is made through preference shares and/or loan notes, possible alongside third-party debt finance. Under this mechanism, the return achieved by the managers can be significantly higher than the one achieved by the financial investors.
  • Performance ratchet. Preferred shares linked to a performance ratchet generally provide a return exceeding that of the ordinary shares. The managers subscribe to preferred shares at a price based on an assessment report prepared by a third-party expert. As a result, preferred (ratchet) shares provide maximum flexibility.
  • Founder stock options. Certain newly or recently created (registered for less than 15 years and are not the result of mergers, restructurings, extensions or takeovers of pre-existing activities) unlisted or small-capitalisation (less than EU150,000) companies can grant specific warrants to their employees or certain corporate representatives or board members specific warrants (bons de souscription de parts de créateur d'entreprise) (BSPCE). These warrants allow the beneficiaries to subscribe (on the BSPCEs' allocation date) to a capital increase of the issuing company at a predetermined price. The shares can be ordinary or preferred shares. A grant of BSPCEs provides both legal certainty (beneficiaries benefit from a legally-framed tax and social regime) and flexibility (BSPCEs' conditions of grant and exercise are not mandated by law and so can be contractually determined). However, as the allocation of BSPCEs is a contract of a personal nature, they are not assignable.
28. Are any tax reliefs or incentives available to portfolio company managers investing in their company?

Free Shares

For free shares allocated through a decision of a shareholders' meeting held after 1 January 2018, the acquisition gain (fair market value of the free shares at the time of issuance) is taxed on disposal of the free shares as ordinary income, after a deduction of 50% for the part not exceeding EUR300,000. Social charges and contributions (prélèvements sociaux, contribution salariale and contribution patronale) also apply to the acquisition gain.
The disposal gain (excess of sale price over the value of the free shares at the time of issuance) benefits from the "flat tax" regime (see Question 14).
Both gains are included in the assessment of the French exceptional contribution on high income.
The free shares must be held directly by the managers and cannot be held through any PEA (see Question 4).

Stock Options

For stock options allocated through a decision of a shareholders' meeting held after 28 September 2012, an acquisition gain (the difference between the fair market value of the share and its exercise price) is taxed as salary on disposal of the acquired shares. Social charges and contributions also apply (see above, Free shares).
The disposal gain benefits from the "flat tax" regime.
Both gains are included in the assessment of the French exceptional contribution on high income.
The stock options and the shares deriving from their exercise cannot be held through any PEA (see Question 4).

Founder Options

Provided that the BSPCE warrants are exercised within the time limit set by the shareholders' meeting, and the beneficiary has worked in the issuing company for at least three years, the net gain (excess of sale price over the exercise value of the warrant) benefits from the flat tax regime (see above and Question 14).
This gain is also included in the assessment of the French exceptional contribution on high income.
The founder stock options and the shares deriving from their exercise cannot be held through any PEA (see Question 4).
29. Are there any restrictions on dividends, interest payments and other payments by a portfolio company to its investors?
To declare and pay dividends lawfully to shareholders, companies must have profits available for distribution (Commercial Code). Despite those restrictions under the Commercial Code, the Newco articles of association, or the Newco shareholders' agreement, can establish an order of priorities of payments for the financial rights attached to each category of securities (structured, for example, through a first rank priority dividend or a liquidation premium). This "waterfall" applies in the context of any liquidation of Newco or any other exit, regardless of the level of Newco profits available for distribution at that time.
30. What anti-corruption/anti-bribery protections are typically included in investment documents? What local law penalties apply to fund executives who are directors if the portfolio company or its agents are found guilty under applicable anti-corruption or anti-bribery laws?
Law 2016-1691 of 9 December 2016 relating to transparency, anti-corruption and economic modernisation (Sapin II) (Anti-corruption Law) imposes anti-corruption compliance obligations on corporations.

Protections

The following companies must implement a compliance programme to prevent acts of bribery and corruption (including a code of conduct and an internal warning system:
  • Companies incorporated in France with more than 500 employees and an annual turnover of more than EUR100 million.
  • Companies belonging to a group with more than 500 employees whose parent company's registered office is located in France and has an annual turnover of more than EUR100 million.
(Article 17, Anti-corruption Law.)
The anti-corruption agency (Agence Française Anticorruption) (AFA) provides annual, non-binding guidelines aimed at preventing investors from acquiring companies involved in corruption and bribery practices, for which they may be responsible after the completion of the transaction. The AFA:
  • Advises companies to carry out a corruption and bribery risk assessment of the target company and to assess its compliance policy.
  • Recommends that companies, at each stage of the transaction, carry out anti-corruption audits of the target company.

Penalties

Bribery, which can either be "active" (promising or giving the bribe) or "passive" (receiving or accepting the bribe), can attract fines and prison sentences; these vary, depending on the specific offence under the Criminal Code. Corporations convicted of bribery or certain other offences can also be excluded from public tenders for a certain period of time.
Corruption can also attract fines and prison sentences under the Criminal Code. A legal entity convicted of corruption can also be subject to the additional penalty of mandatory compliance, under which it must implement an anti-corruption programme (Article 18, Anti-corruption Law).
These rules may evolve over the next months. The Sapin III Bill of 19 July 2021, which is still under discussion, aims at reinforcing companies' and local authorities' obligations in terms of compliance and whistleblower protection.

Exit Strategies

31. What forms of exit are typically used to realise a private equity fund's investment in a successful company? What are the relative advantages and disadvantages of each?

Forms of Exit

If the investment in a portfolio company is successful, the most common forms of exit are currently either trade sales or secondary sales to other PE funds. IPOs are not currently very common. General partner (GP)-led single-asset secondary transactions have emerged and are increasingly common (see below).

Advantages and Disadvantages

Trade sale. A trade sale conducted as an auction or competitive process can greatly increase the price payable for the target company (a buyout can also occur through a pre-emptive bid process outside the auction process, which may speed up the process but may reduce the price payable for the target company). A trade sale allows the PE fund to retain greater control over the process than in other exit options, and ensures an immediate cash return to the fund.
The bidder usually selected at the end of the process may be a trade buyer, another PE fund or even the portfolio company's management alone or in a consortium with minority financial investor(s).
A trade buyer generally seeks extensive warranties or indemnities, which PE funds resist. Warranty and indemnity insurance is now becoming popular (even in the context of transactions involving only French PE buyers) but less so than in some common law jurisdictions.
Reputational risks may arise in a trade sale if the sale does not complete or if there are job losses as a result of the sale.
A management buyout incentivises management involved in the buyout to ensure completion of a successful exit for the PE fund, and may be less likely to facilitate a sale to a competing bidder. A successful buyout is usually dependent on the management team securing funding that can be provided by a PE fund which then takes a controlling stake in the company.
Secondary buyout. A secondary buyout involves a sale of a portfolio company to another PE fund. These sales generally complete very quickly, with representations and warranties limited to fundamental representations. However, the exiting fund is exposed to potential market embarrassment if the acquiring fund subsequently achieves a swift exit with a significant return.
IPO. A successful IPO can maximise the price payable for shares in the company. Most Newco shareholders' agreements generally include a lock-in period (restricting them from disposing of their shares for a set period). The costs, time and risk of an IPO are also substantial, and may not permit a full and timely exit for the PE fund. The cash return to the fund is therefore delayed and the fund may be exposed to adverse price variations between the IPO and the final cash realisation.
GP-led single-asset secondary sale. These transactions offer fund managers an ideal exit scenario, particularly in the recent climate of the issues created by the COVID-19 pandemic. By the end of a classic two-round process (due diligence and a call for bids), the subscribers to the selling fund can either receive the proceeds of the sale, or participate in the new special purpose vehicle to maintain their exposure to the asset and thus maximise their exit valuation. This exit structure is therefore a solution for GPs intending to keep a promising company in their portfolio longer than the fund's lifetime, rather than selling it and losing some of the potential capital gain.
Asset sales and portfolio sales are less common.
32. What forms of exit are typically used to end the private equity fund's investment in an unsuccessful/distressed company? What are the relative advantages and disadvantages of each?

Forms of Exit

If an investment is not successful, the most common form of exit is the sale of the portfolio company to another investor or to the portfolio company's management, alone or in a consortium with minority financial investor(s).

Advantages and Disadvantages

This type of sale allows the PE fund to recover some of its investment and to keep its reputation in the market, which could be damaged in the event of a judicial liquidation.
Insolvency procedures under Book VI of the Commercial Code should be considered where the portfolio company in question is distressed. For all of these procedures (except judicial liquidation), a backup/insolvency plan is drawn up, which may include the sale of all or part of portfolio company's shares and/or assets to a buyer. However, a sale price achieved in this context does not necessarily recover the PE fund's initial investment, and is allocated in priority to the settlement of portfolio company's creditors.

Reform

33. What recent reforms or proposals for reform affect private equity?

Draft ATAD III Directive

The draft ATAD III Directive (published on 22 December 2021) aims at preventing the misuse of shell entity companies; these are companies which:
  • Have income over the preceding two tax years which is at least 75% passive income (that is, income derived from investments).
  • Are engaged in cross-border activity.
  • Have outsourced within the preceding two tax years the management of their day-to-day operations and decision-making on significant functions.
Exemptions would apply, including for certain regulated financial companies, companies with transferable securities listed on a regulated market, and companies with at least five full-time employees carrying out the activities which generate the relevant income.
Companies deemed to be shell entities would need to produce reports containing certain information which would enable assessment of whether the substances tests are met: if the company failed to meet the minimum substance requirement, it would be deemed a shell entity and would:
  • Not benefit from tax relief on any EU directive or any applicable double tax treaty.
  • Be taxed at the level of its stakeholders rather than retaining its own legal identity.

Management Packages

Stock warrants. The Supreme Court held in 2019 that the allocation of stock warrants to an employee on favourable terms qualifies as a benefit subject to social security contributions based on the value of the stock warrants at the date of their "free disposal," provided that the beneficiary is subject to the social security scheme at the relevant date (Cour de cassation, civile, Chambre civile 2, 4 April 2019, 17-24.470).
Capital gains on management packages. In 2021, the administrative Supreme Court handed down three important decisions on the conditions under which the tax authorities can treat capital gains arising from "management packages" as employee income (the cases dealt with share options granted outside the legal stock options regime, and warrants).
  • The court held that the gains arising from the disposal, on exit, of a financial instrument can be treated as ordinary income when:
  • The source of the capital gains derives from the taxpayer's exercise of an employee or management position.
  • The conditions in which the gains were realised mean that those gains should be regarded as consideration for the manager or employee's position rather than a gain realised by the seller in its capacity as investor (Conseil d'État, 3ème, 8ème, 9ème et 10ème chambres réunies, 13/07/2021, 428506).
It should be noted that, in the authors' view, preferred ratchet shares subscribed for by key employees would be viewed in the same way under this case law.
The court construed the "link" between the gain and the salaried or management position of the taxpayer very broadly; it did not consider as significant the fact that the taxpayer had effectively borne a financial risk or that the instrument had been acquired or subscribed for at fair market value (until the court decisions, these were the main factors in construing the gain as being a capital gain). The Financière Derby case, one of those assessed in this decision, set out detail of factors seen as linking the gain and the manager's position).
The opinion of the attorney general upholds this understanding. The attorney general states publicly and independently an opinion on the issues to be decided in the applications and on the solutions they require. The judges of the administrative Supreme Court are not bound by the attorney general's conclusions.
  • Although it is not easy to draw definitive conclusions at this stage, the decisions and the opinion of the attorney general:
  • Suggest there should be reconsideration, for the future, of leavers' mechanisms and provisions in shareholders' agreements imposing contractual obligations on the taxpayer in their capacity as a manager (lock-up, exclusivity, and non-compete) rather than in their capacity as a shareholder.
  • Emphasise that statutory regimes, such as "free shares" plans and/or "stock-option" plans, should be favoured over ad hoc instruments, especially when they are only for the benefit of managers (such as ratchet shares).

Contributor Profiles

Olivier Deren, Partner

Paul Hastings

T +33 1 42 99 04 50 
F +33 1 45 63 91 49
E [email protected]
W www.paulhastings.com
Areas of practice/transactions. Private equity; mergers and acquisitions.
Recent transactions
  • Recognised as a leading private equity lawyer in France by Chambers Europe (Band 1).
  • Advises private equity funds and managers on their leveraged buyouts and capital development transactions as well as companies on their growth strategies or reorganisations.

Sébastien Crepy, Partner

Paul Hastings

T +33 1 42 99 04 50 
F +33 1 45 63 91 49
E [email protected]
W www.paulhastings.com
Areas of practice. Private equity; mergers and acquisitions.
Recent transactions
  • Recognised as a "Next Generation Lawyer" in Private Equity in France: LBO by Legal 500 EMEA, 2019.
  • Recently worked on PE (for investment funds and management teams) and M&A transactions in the following industries: IT and technologies, healthcare (medtech, artificial insemination, clinics, health equipment manufacturing), business services, energy and transportation and agribusiness.

Allard de Waal, Partner

Paul Hastings

T +33 1 42 99 04 50 
F +33 1 45 63 91 49
E [email protected]
W www.paulhastings.com
Areas of practice. Tax, national and cross-border transactions.
Recent transactions
  • Recognised as one of the most authoritative lawyers on complex issues involving international tax treaties and in structuring both national and international investments.
  • Recently provided strategic advice to various financial investors involved in major tax audits and tax controversies.

Andras Csonka, Partner

Paul Hastings

T +33 1 42 99 04 30
F +33 1 78 40 46 98
E [email protected]
W www.paulhastings.com
Areas of practice. Fund formation; private investment funds.
Recent transactions
  • Advises on the sale and acquisition of fund portfolios and direct investments, as well as on the review of investment funds for French and international clients.
  • Advises institutional clients on all aspects of their activities, including French and European regulatory issues, the authorisation and monitoring of portfolio management companies, and the structuring of co-investments and carried interest plans for management teams.