VSI v. Creative Pipe: The Evolution of the Obligation to Preserve Electronically Stored Information | Practical Law

VSI v. Creative Pipe: The Evolution of the Obligation to Preserve Electronically Stored Information | Practical Law

This Article discusses the Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc. decision in which Magistrate Judge Paul Grimm of the US District Court for the District of Maryland analyzes the various standards used by US federal courts to determine whether a party has complied with its duty to preserve and produce electronically stored information (ESI) in litigation. This Article also discusses the importance of using a proportionality analysis when considering electronic discovery (e-discovery) sanctions.

VSI v. Creative Pipe: The Evolution of the Obligation to Preserve Electronically Stored Information

by Helen K. Michael, Barry J. Fleishman and Tina Fahmy, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
Published on 15 Apr 2011USA (National/Federal)
This Article discusses the Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc. decision in which Magistrate Judge Paul Grimm of the US District Court for the District of Maryland analyzes the various standards used by US federal courts to determine whether a party has complied with its duty to preserve and produce electronically stored information (ESI) in litigation. This Article also discusses the importance of using a proportionality analysis when considering electronic discovery (e-discovery) sanctions.