Final Global Margin Rules for Uncleared Derivatives Released by International Regulators | Practical Law

Final Global Margin Rules for Uncleared Derivatives Released by International Regulators | Practical Law

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) released joint final guidelines on minimum international standards for collateralizing non-centrally cleared derivatives.

Final Global Margin Rules for Uncleared Derivatives Released by International Regulators

by Practical Law Finance
Published on 05 Sep 2013USA (National/Federal)
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) released joint final guidelines on minimum international standards for collateralizing non-centrally cleared derivatives.
On September 2, 2013, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) together issued final guidelines on global margin collateral requirements for uncleared derivatives. The global margin collateral guidelines apply to over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions and to the business conduct of financial firms and systemically important non-financial entities (covered entities). Non-centrally cleared derivatives entered into by non-financial entities that are not systemically important do not require margin under these guidelines.
The final guidelines themselves are not binding on market participants and require further rulemaking by national regulators. However, some jurisdictions, including the US, have already proposed derivatives margin collateral rules that are now more stringent in some areas than those included in the final guidelines. US regulators therefore now have some latitude to softening proposed Dodd-Frank swap margin collateral rules (see Practice Note, The Dodd-Frank Act: Derivatives Margin Collateral Rules: Dodd-Frank Margin Collateral Collection Requirements).
The final guidelines incorporate eight key elements, which highlight the following:
  • Covered entities must exchange initial and variation margin appropriate to its counterparty risk when engaging in non-centrally cleared derivatives transactions. Calculations of baseline initial margin and variation margin collected from a counterparty should be consistent across covered entities, reflecting potential future exposure (initial margin) and current exposure (variation margin) under the transaction, and should ensure that all counterparty risk exposures are fully covered with a high degree of confidence. The initial margin should satisfy a "one-tailed 99% confidence interval" over a ten day period with significant financial stress and may be determined with either a quantitative portfolio margin model or a standardized margin schedule. Counterparties must exchange variation margin in an amount sufficient to fully collateralize the mark-to-market exposure of their derivative transaction.
  • Derivatives transactions that are not cleared by "Central Clearing Parties" (derivatives clearinghouses) should have margin posted appropriately.
  • Exempted from initial margin requirements are:
    • physically settled foreign exchange (FX) forwards and swaps; and
    • fixed, physically settled FX transactions associated with the exchange of principal of cross-currency swaps.
    While initial margin is not required for these derivatives, variation margin is required to cover counterparty exposures under those transactions
  • National regulators may subject initial margin requirements to a floor (which may not exceed €50 million), below which no margin collateral is required to be posted under the transaction and may set a de-minimis minimum transfer amount (which may not exceed €500,000), below which margin collateral need not be transferred between the parties. Variation margin must be posted on all transactions and cannot be subject to a floor. After the final phase-in date (see below), entities with less than €8 billion in gross notional outstanding uncleared swaps need not follow these margin requirements.
  • Unlike under margin collateral collection rules proposed by US bank regulators under Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act (see Practice Note, The Dodd-Frank Act: Derivatives Margin Collateral Rules: Dodd-Frank Margin Collateral Collection Proposals), non-systemically significant non-financial entities (commercial end users) are not covered entities and therefore need not collect or post margin under these guidelines. Sovereigns, central banks, multilateral development banks and the Bank for International Settlements are also exempt from initial margin posting.
  • The assets collected as collateral for initial and variation margin (eligible collateral) must be liquid enough to generate proceeds sufficient to protect the collecting entity from losses on non-centrally cleared derivatives in a reasonable amount of time if a counterparty defaults. The collateral posted must be able to hold its value in a time of financial stress, taking into account required haircuts. Eligible collateral mentioned in the final guidelines includes:
    • cash;
    • high quality government and central bank securities;
    • high quality corporate or covered bonds;
    • equities that appear on major stock indices; and
    • gold.
    National regulators will be charged with compiling their own lists of eligible collateral. However this is a more permissive eligible collateral guideline than had been previously proposed, which may be an attempt to maintain liquidity in collateral markets that many fear may be jeopardized by the aspects of these margin collateral rules that require large amounts of initial margin to be posted between certain parties to certain transactions. Covered entities will, in many cases, need to stockpile these eligible assets to use as collateral for derivatives trades under these rules.
  • Initial margin should be exchanged by both parties on a gross basis and held to ensure that:
    • in the event of a counterparty default, the margin collected is immediately available to the collecting party; and
    • in the event of a collecting party default, the collected margin is subject to arrangements that fully protect the posting party (to the extent possible under applicable law).
    As part of ensuring the availability of posted margin, an entity that collects initial margin from a counterparty must segregate or provide other adequate protection for the posted initial margin and may only rehypothecate the posted margin one time. The guidelines require the adoption of strict national regulations that ensure that posted margin may only be rehypothecated one time, prohibiting the third party to which the margin has been rehypothecated from any further rehypothecation.
  • An entity that collects initial margin may only rehypothecate the collected margin if, among other things:
    • the initial margin is collected from a customer "buy-side" entity, which excludes any entity that regularly makes a market in derivatives, or quotes bid or offer prices on derivatives contracts;
    • the collecting entity discloses to the customer the risks associated with rehypothecation and that it has the right to disallow rehypothecation;
    • the customer gives express written consent to the collecting entity to rehypothecate posted margin;
    • at all times, initial posted margin is treated as a customer asset and segregated from the proprietary assets of both the collecting entity and the entity to which the initial margin has been rehypothecated;
    • the initial posted margin of customers that have consented to rehypothecation is segregated from the initial posted margin of customers who have not consented to rehypothecation;
    • if a customer's initial margin is individually segregated, it is only rehypothecated to hedge the collecting entity's position that arose out of the initial transaction with the customer; and
    • the collecting entity contractually requires that the third party to which any initial margin that has been rehypothecated segregates the funds from its other customers, counterparties and its own proprietary assets in the same manner in which the customer has requested that the collecting entity segregates its margin.
  • Transactions between a firm and its affiliates should be subject to appropriate regulation in a manner consistent with each jurisdiction's legal and regulatory framework.
  • Regulatory regimes should interact to foster consistency and eliminate duplicity across jurisdictions for margin requirements.
  • Regulators should phase in margin requirements over an appropriate period of time to ensure that the transition costs associated with the new framework can be appropriately managed. Margin requirements only apply to swaps entered into after the applicable phase-in date and do not apply to derivatives contracts that existed prior to the applicable phase-in date. The phase-in periods must provide for the exchange of variation margin on December 1, 2015 and the exchange of initial margin after:
    • December 1, 2015 for firms with consolidated-group aggregate month-end average notional non-centrally cleared derivatives outstanding for June, July and August of 2015 in excess of €3 trillion;
    • December 1, 2016 for firms with consolidated-group aggregate month-end average notional non-centrally cleared derivatives outstanding for June, July and August of 2016 in excess of €2.25 trillion;
    • December 1, 2017 for firms with consolidated-group aggregate month-end average notional non-centrally cleared derivatives outstanding for June, July and August of 2017 in excess of €1.5 trillion;
    • December 1, 2018 for firms with consolidated-group aggregate month-end average notional non-centrally cleared derivatives outstanding for June, July and August of 2018 in excess of €.75 trillion; and
    • December 1, 2019 for firms with consolidated-group aggregate month-end average notional non-centrally cleared derivatives outstanding for June, July and August of that year in excess of €8 billion.

Implications for US Dodd-Frank Swap Margin Collateral Rules

Though the final BCBS/IOSCO final swap margin collateral guidelines (see BCBS/IOSCO Recommendations on Swap Margin Collateral) are not binding on market participants, they will function as a blueprint for US regulators in promulgating final Dodd-Frank swap margin collateral rules. National regulators may implement more stringent swap margin collateral rules than those specified in the BCBS/IOSCO final guidelines, though not less stringent rules. In certain cases proposed Dodd-Frank swap margin collateral rules are more stringent than those included in the BCBS/IOSCO final guidelines.
For example, under swap margin collateral collection rules proposed by federal bank regulators, commercial end users must post initial margin to their swap dealer counterparties (see Practice Note, Derivatives Margin Collateral Requirements under Dodd-Frank: Dodd-Frank Margin Collateral Collection Requirements). However, under the BCBS/IOSCO final guidelines, non-financial commercial end users would not be required to post initial margin collateral under their swaps. Therefore, under the BCBS/IOSCO final guidelines, US regulators now have some latitude to softening proposed Dodd-Frank swap margin collateral rules and it is anticipated that they will do so when they issue final or re-proposed Dodd-Frank margin collateral rules later this year.