Moscow Chamber of Commerce and Industry Arbitration Court and Economic Court of CIS rule on consent to arbitrate under Moscow Convention | Practical Law

Moscow Chamber of Commerce and Industry Arbitration Court and Economic Court of CIS rule on consent to arbitrate under Moscow Convention | Practical Law

In OKKV v Kyrgyzstan [Case No A-2013/10], Lee Jong Baek v Kyrgyzstan [Case No A-2013/10] and Stans Energy Inc. v Kyrgyzstan [Case No A-2013/29], the MCCI Arbitration Court and later the Economic Court of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), at the request of Kyrgyzstan, gave their interpretation as to whether Article 11 of the Moscow Convention constituted actual consent of the state to arbitrate in any international arbitration institution in an investment dispute.

Moscow Chamber of Commerce and Industry Arbitration Court and Economic Court of CIS rule on consent to arbitrate under Moscow Convention

by Rimma Malinskaya (Senior Associate), Goltsblat BLP
Published on 29 Oct 2014 • Russian Federation
In OKKV v Kyrgyzstan [Case No A-2013/10], Lee Jong Baek v Kyrgyzstan [Case No A-2013/10] and Stans Energy Inc. v Kyrgyzstan [Case No A-2013/29], the MCCI Arbitration Court and later the Economic Court of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), at the request of Kyrgyzstan, gave their interpretation as to whether Article 11 of the Moscow Convention constituted actual consent of the state to arbitrate in any international arbitration institution in an investment dispute.