Courts in main and secondary insolvency proceedings have concurrent jurisdiction to decide which assets fall within the scope of the secondary proceedings (ECJ) | Practical Law

Courts in main and secondary insolvency proceedings have concurrent jurisdiction to decide which assets fall within the scope of the secondary proceedings (ECJ) | Practical Law

In Comité d'entreprise de Nortel Networks and others (Judgment) [2015] EUECJ C-649/13 the European Court of Justice considered the impact of Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings in relation to the jurisdiction of the national courts in each of main and secondary insolvency proceedings to determine what assets fell within the scope of the secondary proceedings.

Courts in main and secondary insolvency proceedings have concurrent jurisdiction to decide which assets fall within the scope of the secondary proceedings (ECJ)

by Practical Law Restructuring and Insolvency
Published on 17 Jun 2015 • European Union
In Comité d'entreprise de Nortel Networks and others (Judgment) [2015] EUECJ C-649/13 the European Court of Justice considered the impact of Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings in relation to the jurisdiction of the national courts in each of main and secondary insolvency proceedings to determine what assets fell within the scope of the secondary proceedings.