BancorpSouth Bank Target of CFPB and DOJ Complaint for “Redlining” | Practical Law

BancorpSouth Bank Target of CFPB and DOJ Complaint for “Redlining” | Practical Law

The Department of Justice and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau announced a settlement agreement resolving allegations that mortgage lender BancorpSouth discriminated against potential borrowers residing in minority neighborhoods in violation of the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act.

BancorpSouth Bank Target of CFPB and DOJ Complaint for “Redlining”

Practical Law Legal Update w-002-7558 (Approx. 4 pages)

BancorpSouth Bank Target of CFPB and DOJ Complaint for “Redlining”

by Practical Law Finance
Published on 14 Jul 2016USA (National/Federal)
The Department of Justice and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau announced a settlement agreement resolving allegations that mortgage lender BancorpSouth discriminated against potential borrowers residing in minority neighborhoods in violation of the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
On June 29, 2016, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) jointly filed a civil action and consent order (Consent Order) against BancorpSouth Bank (BancorpSouth) in the US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi. The complaint alleged that BancorpSouth engaged in a pattern of lending practices that discriminated on the basis of, among other things, race, color, and national origin, in violation of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) and Fair Housing Act (FHA).
These federal laws bar lenders from discriminating against individuals on the basis of a particular characteristic (including, but not limited to, race, color, and national origin). Under both ECOA and FHA, lenders are prohibited from making statements, implementing policies, or otherwise engaging in acts that in any way discourage individuals in a certain protected group from applying for credit.
The complaint alleges that Bancorp South violated the ECOA and FHA by engaging in the following conduct:
  • Redlining in the Memphis Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). The government alleged that BancorpSouth, the leading mortgage provider in the MSA, unlawfully redlined with the goal of serving majority-White neighborhoods while avoiding majority-minority neighborhoods. BancorpSouth allegedly engaged in redlining by excluding nearly all majority-minority neighborhoods in the MSA from its Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) assessment area. In particular, BancorpSouth failed to meet the needs of minority communities by encouraging its loan officers to be active in the CRA assessment area as well as only operating retail bank locations and targeting marketing campaigns in the same CRA assessment area. According to the complaint, the lender’s actions resulted in a discriminatory effect that reduced credit availability in majority-minority neighborhoods and discouraged potential minority prospective applicants from seeking loans.
  • Discriminating in the underwriting of mortgages. BancorpSouth also allegedly discriminated against African-American applicants by consistently rejecting their mortgage applications at higher rates than the applications of similarly-situated White applicants. The complaint referenced an aggregate rejection rate that was 11.9% higher for African-American applicants than for similarly-situated White applicants. The government alleged that this disparity was caused by the wide discretion afforded to BancorpSouth employees in connection with the loan approval process.
  • Discriminating in the pricing of mortgages. The complaint also alleged that BancorpSouth discriminated against African-American borrowers by charging them higher interest rates than those received by similarly-situated White applicants. The complaint noted that African-American borrowers received loans with interest rates that were 30-64 basis points higher, on average. The government alleged that this disparity was caused by the virtually unlimited discretion afforded to BancorpSouth employees in connection with the loan pricing process.
  • Implementing discriminatory loan policies. BancorpSouth also allegedly implemented a policy that encouraged employees to deny minority applicants more quickly than similarly-situated White applicants, particularly minority applicants deemed “borderline” under BancorpSouth policies. The government relied upon recordings from internal company meetings to support this allegation.

Consent Order Terms

The Consent Order contains the following provisions:
  • Remediation Plan. BancorpSouth must engage a compliance-management-systems consultant to review and revise BancorpSouth’s compliance management system in order to avoid discriminatory practices. BancorpSouth also must implement official mortgage pricing policies and procedures. Further, loan officers, branch managers, other relevant managers or senior managers, marketing employees, and the Board of Directors must undergo fair lending training. Finally, BancorpSouth must make efforts to expand its reach by opening branch locations in majority-minority neighborhoods within the MSA.
  • Monetary Penalties. BancorpSouth must pay the following:
    • $4,000,000 for a loan subsidy program that would extend affordable loans to qualified applicants in the MSA.
    • $2,776,890 for a settlement fund established to provide redress for alleged victims of underwriting and/or pricing discrimination.
    • $800,000 for the establishment of community programs, advertising/outreach, and credit repair.
    • $3,030,756 in civil penalties to the CFPB.

Practical Implications

This case represents the latest in several high dollar actions brought by the DOJ and CFPB to combat redlining and other discriminatory lending practices. Lenders should be diligent to ensure that proper policies, procedures, and controls are in place to comply with the ECOA and FHA.
For a more detailed discussion of the CRA, see Practice Note, Community Reinvestment Act Requirements for Banks
For a discussion on fair lending laws as applied to residential mortgages, see Practice Note, Fair Lending Laws for Residential Mortgages
For more information on fair lending practices and developing a fair lending compliance program, see Fair Lending Compliance Checklist.