Jackson Lewis: Ohio Does Not Require Proof of Workplace Injury for Workers' Compensation Retaliation Claim | Practical Law

Jackson Lewis: Ohio Does Not Require Proof of Workplace Injury for Workers' Compensation Retaliation Claim | Practical Law

This Law Firm Publication by Jackson Lewis, P.C. discusses a recent decision by the Ohio Supreme Court holding that a worker is not required to prove he suffered a workplace injury to state a prima facie case of retaliation under Ohio's workers' compensation statute. The court's decision in Onderko v. Sierra Lobo, Inc. held that the statute's plain language only requires that the employee file or initiate a workers' compensation claim or testify in a workers' compensation proceeding in order to later pursue a retaliation claim.

Jackson Lewis: Ohio Does Not Require Proof of Workplace Injury for Workers' Compensation Retaliation Claim

by Jackson Lewis, P.C.
Published on 21 Jul 2016Ohio, United States
This Law Firm Publication by Jackson Lewis, P.C. discusses a recent decision by the Ohio Supreme Court holding that a worker is not required to prove he suffered a workplace injury to state a prima facie case of retaliation under Ohio's workers' compensation statute. The court's decision in Onderko v. Sierra Lobo, Inc. held that the statute's plain language only requires that the employee file or initiate a workers' compensation claim or testify in a workers' compensation proceeding in order to later pursue a retaliation claim.