Jackson Lewis: Wisconsin Court Finds Anti-Poaching Agreements to Be Unenforceable | Practical Law

Jackson Lewis: Wisconsin Court Finds Anti-Poaching Agreements to Be Unenforceable | Practical Law

This Law Firm Publication by Jackson Lewis P.C. discusses The Manitowac Company v. Lanning, in which the Wisconsin Court of Appeals analyzed a non-poaching agreement as a non-compete agreement, holding that the agreement was overbroad and unenforceable because it essentially prohibited a former employee from "encouraging any employee to leave [the company] for any reason or to take any job with any competitor, supplier, or customer." In Wisconsin, a restrictive covenant is enforceable only if its restrictions are reasonably necessary to protect the employer from unfair competition.

Jackson Lewis: Wisconsin Court Finds Anti-Poaching Agreements to Be Unenforceable

Practical Law Legal Update w-003-1446 (Approx. 4 pages)

Jackson Lewis: Wisconsin Court Finds Anti-Poaching Agreements to Be Unenforceable

by Jackson Lewis P.C.
Published on 19 Aug 2016Wisconsin
This Law Firm Publication by Jackson Lewis P.C. discusses The Manitowac Company v. Lanning, in which the Wisconsin Court of Appeals analyzed a non-poaching agreement as a non-compete agreement, holding that the agreement was overbroad and unenforceable because it essentially prohibited a former employee from "encouraging any employee to leave [the company] for any reason or to take any job with any competitor, supplier, or customer." In Wisconsin, a restrictive covenant is enforceable only if its restrictions are reasonably necessary to protect the employer from unfair competition.