No conflict and no grounds for revision of Bosch Rexroth v Piacentini award (Swiss Supreme Court) | Practical Law

No conflict and no grounds for revision of Bosch Rexroth v Piacentini award (Swiss Supreme Court) | Practical Law

In decision 4A_386/2015, the Swiss Supreme Court considered whether an indirect link between the sole arbitrator and an affiliate of the claimant, through an associated law firm, was a ground for revision of the award.

No conflict and no grounds for revision of Bosch Rexroth v Piacentini award (Swiss Supreme Court)

Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report w-003-8938 (Approx. 5 pages)

No conflict and no grounds for revision of Bosch Rexroth v Piacentini award (Swiss Supreme Court)

by Prof Dr Nathalie Voser (Partner) and Anya George (Senior Associate), Schellenberg Wittmer Ltd
Published on 12 Oct 2016 • Switzerland
In decision 4A_386/2015, the Swiss Supreme Court considered whether an indirect link between the sole arbitrator and an affiliate of the claimant, through an associated law firm, was a ground for revision of the award.