SEC Issues New C&DIs on Pay Ratio Disclosure | Practical Law

SEC Issues New C&DIs on Pay Ratio Disclosure | Practical Law

The SEC's Division of Corporation Finance issued five new compliance and disclosure interpretations (C&DIs) on pay ratio disclosure.

SEC Issues New C&DIs on Pay Ratio Disclosure

Practical Law Legal Update w-004-0343 (Approx. 5 pages)

SEC Issues New C&DIs on Pay Ratio Disclosure

by Practical Law Corporate & Securities
Published on 20 Oct 2016USA (National/Federal)
The SEC's Division of Corporation Finance issued five new compliance and disclosure interpretations (C&DIs) on pay ratio disclosure.
On October 18, 2016, the SEC's Division of Corporation Finance issued five new compliance and disclosure interpretations (C&DIs) on pay ratio disclosure. The SEC's pay ratio rule, mandated by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act, requires reporting companies to disclose the median of the annual total compensation of all company employees other than the company's chief executive officer (CEO), the CEO's annual total compensation, and the ratio between these two numbers. The first disclosure under the rule is due in 2018, covering a company's fiscal year beginning on or after January 1, 2017.
The new C&DIs provide clarification on:
  • Using a consistently applied compensation measure (CACM) to identify the median employee. Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K requires registrants to identify the median employee using annual total compensation or another CACM, such as information derived from the registrant's tax or payroll records. Any measure that reasonably reflects the annual compensation of employees could serve as a CACM, and the appropriateness of any measure will depend on the registrant's particular facts and circumstances. For example:
    • total cash compensation could be a CACM unless the registrant also distributed annual equity awards widely among its employees; and
    • social security taxes withheld would likely not be a CACM unless all employees earned less than the Social Security wage base.
    The registrant must also briefly disclose the compensation measure used. It is not expected that the CACM would necessarily identify the same median employee as if the registrant were to use annual total compensation.
  • Using hourly or annual rates of pay as a CACM. While an hourly or annual pay rate may be a component used to determine an employee's overall compensation, the use of the pay rate alone generally is not an appropriate CACM to identify the median employee because:
    • using an hourly rate without taking into account the number of hours actually worked would be similar to making a full-time equivalent adjustment for part-time employees, which is not permitted; and
    • using an annual rate only, without regard to whether the employees worked the entire year and were actually paid that amount during the year, would be similar to annualizing pay, which the rule only permits in limited circumstances.
  • The time period that a registrant using a CACM may use. In calculating the required pay ratio, a registrant must first select a date within three months of the end of its fiscal year to determine the population of its employees from which to identify the median employee. Once the employee population is determined, the registrant must identify the median employee from that population using either annual total compensation or another CACM. In applying the CACM, a registrant is not required to use a period that includes the date on which the employee population is determined, nor is it required to use a full annual period. In addition, a CACM may consist of annual total compensation from the registrant's prior fiscal year so long as there has not been a change in the registrant's employee population or employee compensation arrangements that would result in a significant change of its pay distribution to its workforce. (Question 128C.03.)
  • Treatment of furloughed employees. Because a furlough could have different meanings for different employers, registrants will need to determine based on the facts and circumstances whether it should include as employees workers that are furloughed on the date the employee population is determined. If the registrant determines that a furloughed worker is an employee on that date, his or her compensation should be determined by the same method as for a non-furloughed employee. The registrant must determine in which class the employee belongs on that date (full-time, part-time, temporary, or seasonal) and determine the individual's compensation using annual total compensation or another CACM in accordance with Instruction 5 of Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K. Instruction 5 states that a registrant may annualize the total compensation for all permanent employees (full-time or part-time):
    • that were employed by the registrant for less than the full fiscal year; or
    • who were on an unpaid leave of absence during the period.
    In contrast, a registrant may not annualize the total compensation for employees in temporary or seasonal positions. It also may not make a full-time equivalent adjustment for any employee. (Question 128C.04.)
  • Treatment of independent contractors. In determining whether a worker is an employee under the pay ratio rule, a registrant must consider the composition of its workforce and its overall employment and compensation practices. A registrant should include workers whose compensation it or one of its consolidated subsidiaries determines, regardless of whether these workers would be considered employees for tax or employment law purposes, or under other definitions of that term. The C&DI states that when a registrant obtains the services of workers by contracting with an unaffiliated third party that employs the workers, the SEC staff does not believe the registrant is determining the workers' compensation for purposes of the rule if, for example, the registrant only specifies that those workers receive a minimum level of compensation. Further, an individual who is an independent contractor may be the "unaffiliated third party" who determines his or her own compensation. (Question 128C.05.)