Enter to open, tab to navigate, enter to select
Arbitration blogs: matching arbitrators to party expectations and ChAFTA
Practical Law UK Legal Update w-005-0881 (Approx. 4 pages)
Arbitration blogs: matching arbitrators to party expectations and ChAFTA
| Published on 20 Dec 2016 • ExpandAustralia, China, England...International, Wales |
Two new posts have been published on the Practical Law Arbitration blog. John Denis-Smith at 39 Essex Chambers considers the Puppies or Kittens article and how best to match arbitrators to party expectations. Busola Bayo-Oyo at Stephenson Harwood asks whether the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement (ChAFTA) and its limited investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) provisions could pose problems for foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows.
Two new posts have been published on the Practical Law Arbitration blog:
- In When pets attack: of puppies, kittens and being careful what you ask for, John Denis-Smith at 39 Essex Chambers considers how to match arbitrators to party expectations by reflecting on questions raised in the article, Puppies or Kittens? How to Better Match Arbitrators to Party Expectations.
- In ChAFTA and the hostility towards ISDS: does this carry an FDI risk? Busola Bayo-Oyo at Stephenson Harwood asks whether the narrow investor-state dispute resolution (ISDS) clause in the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement (ChAFTA) will have an impact on foreign direct investment (FDI).