UNCITRAL tribunal denies interim measures to both investor and state | Practical Law

UNCITRAL tribunal denies interim measures to both investor and state | Practical Law

In Dawood Rawat v The Republic of Mauritius (PCA Case 2016-20), an UNCITRAL tribunal considered whether to grant interim measures applied for by both the investor claimant and respondent state.

UNCITRAL tribunal denies interim measures to both investor and state

Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report w-005-4228 (Approx. 4 pages)

UNCITRAL tribunal denies interim measures to both investor and state

by Practical Law Arbitration
Published on 18 Jan 2017 • International
In Dawood Rawat v The Republic of Mauritius (PCA Case 2016-20), an UNCITRAL tribunal considered whether to grant interim measures applied for by both the investor claimant and respondent state.