Jackson Lewis: Florida Whistleblower Act Requires Showing of Actual Violation, Federal Court Rules | Practical Law

Jackson Lewis: Florida Whistleblower Act Requires Showing of Actual Violation, Federal Court Rules | Practical Law

This Law Firm Publication by Jackson Lewis, P.C. discusses a recent decision by a federal district court in Florida holding that the Florida Whistleblower Act (FWA) only protects employees who can establish that an employer has committed an actual violation of a law, rule, or regulation. The court's decision in Graddy v. Wal-Mart Stores rejects a more lenient standard adopted by a Florida appellate court and other federal district courts in Florida that an employee with a good-faith (even if ultimately mistaken) belief that the employer violated a statute, law, or regulation can be protected under the FWA.

Jackson Lewis: Florida Whistleblower Act Requires Showing of Actual Violation, Federal Court Rules

by Jackson Lewis, P.C.
Law stated as at 15 Feb 2017Florida
This Law Firm Publication by Jackson Lewis, P.C. discusses a recent decision by a federal district court in Florida holding that the Florida Whistleblower Act (FWA) only protects employees who can establish that an employer has committed an actual violation of a law, rule, or regulation. The court's decision in Graddy v. Wal-Mart Stores rejects a more lenient standard adopted by a Florida appellate court and other federal district courts in Florida that an employee with a good-faith (even if ultimately mistaken) belief that the employer violated a statute, law, or regulation can be protected under the FWA.