ICSID tribunal considers relevance of findings in related commercial arbitration and rules of attribution | Practical Law

ICSID tribunal considers relevance of findings in related commercial arbitration and rules of attribution | Practical Law

In Ampal-American Israel Corp and others v Arab Republic of Egypt (ICSID Case No. ARB/12/11), an ICSID tribunal considered issues of liability and heads of loss arising from alleged breaches of the US-Egypt bilateral investment treaty (BIT).

ICSID tribunal considers relevance of findings in related commercial arbitration and rules of attribution

Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report w-006-8198 (Approx. 7 pages)

ICSID tribunal considers relevance of findings in related commercial arbitration and rules of attribution

by Karen Maxwell (Barrister), 20 Essex Street
Published on 08 Mar 2017 • International
In Ampal-American Israel Corp and others v Arab Republic of Egypt (ICSID Case No. ARB/12/11), an ICSID tribunal considered issues of liability and heads of loss arising from alleged breaches of the US-Egypt bilateral investment treaty (BIT).
For a separate discussion of this decision, see Blog post, Investment arbitration in the Arab Spring: first lessons.