DIFC Court of Appeal rules on inter-relationship between Articles 7, 12 and 13 of DIFC Arbitration Law | Practical Law

DIFC Court of Appeal rules on inter-relationship between Articles 7, 12 and 13 of DIFC Arbitration Law | Practical Law

In Peter Matthew James Gray v Gibson Dunn and Crutcher LLP [2016] CA 012, the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Court of Appeal considered whether an employer can enforce an arbitration agreement in an employment contract in circumstances where the seat of arbitration had not been designated or determined.

DIFC Court of Appeal rules on inter-relationship between Articles 7, 12 and 13 of DIFC Arbitration Law

Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report w-007-0538 (Approx. 4 pages)

DIFC Court of Appeal rules on inter-relationship between Articles 7, 12 and 13 of DIFC Arbitration Law

by Henry Quinlan (Partner) and Sam Stevens (Senior Legal Consultant), DLA Piper Middle East LLP
Published on 22 Mar 2017 • International, United Arab Emirates
In Peter Matthew James Gray v Gibson Dunn and Crutcher LLP [2016] CA 012, the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Court of Appeal considered whether an employer can enforce an arbitration agreement in an employment contract in circumstances where the seat of arbitration had not been designated or determined.