Tribunal affirms jurisdiction and criticises counsel’s failure to maintain experts’ anonymity (ICSID) | Practical Law

Tribunal affirms jurisdiction and criticises counsel’s failure to maintain experts’ anonymity (ICSID) | Practical Law

In Vladislav Kim and others v Republic of Uzbekistan (ICSID Case No ARB/13/6), an ICSID tribunal considered challenges to its jurisdiction in respect of claims arising under the Kazakhstan-Uzbekistan bilateral investment treaty (BIT).

Tribunal affirms jurisdiction and criticises counsel’s failure to maintain experts’ anonymity (ICSID)

Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report w-007-2440 (Approx. 6 pages)

Tribunal affirms jurisdiction and criticises counsel’s failure to maintain experts’ anonymity (ICSID)

by Karen Maxwell (Barrister), 20 Essex Street
Published on 29 Mar 2017 • International
In Vladislav Kim and others v Republic of Uzbekistan (ICSID Case No ARB/13/6), an ICSID tribunal considered challenges to its jurisdiction in respect of claims arising under the Kazakhstan-Uzbekistan bilateral investment treaty (BIT).